As an experienced banking executive and expert witness, I adhere to a rigorous methodology rooted in industry standards, regulatory guidance, and accepted banking practices when forming independent opinions. My analytical framework ensures opinions are reliable, well-supported, and can withstand scrutiny.
​
Materials Reviewed: I thoroughly examine all relevant case materials, which typically include:

• Loan files, deposit and transaction histories, account records

• System configuration documentation

• Institutional policies and procedures

• Regulatory examination materials and guidance

• Deposition testimony and correspondence

• Other case-specific materials customarily relied upon by banking professionals

 
These are the same types of information I routinely reviewed as a senior banking executive to evaluate operations, lending, regulatory compliance, and internal controls.
 
Analytical Framework: For each engagement, I:

1. Identify the specific issues and timeframe in question

2. Gather and examine all pertinent materials

3. Determine applicable laws, regulations, and regulatory guidance

4. Ascertain the institution's own policies, procedures, and practices

5. Evaluate how the conduct in question aligns with or deviates from accepted practices

6. Consider reasonable actions and responsibilities of parties involved

7. Assess issues of causation and damages as appropriate

8. Summarize findings and opinions, supported by specific evidence

 
My analysis is guided by standards promulgated by authorities like the OCC, FDIC, CFPB, and state banking departments. I also draw upon established industry references, such as the ABA's Banking Terminology and other widely accepted professional resources.
 
Objectivity and Reliability: I hold myself to the highest standards of independence and objectivity. My opinions are not swayed by which party retains me, and I do not accept contingency arrangements. I follow the same thorough, unbiased methodology for both plaintiff and defense counsel.
 
If information emerges during a case that impacts my analysis, I re-evaluate in light of the new evidence. I'm committed to well-reasoned, factually supported opinions that assist the trier of fact.
 
My professional experience as a banking executive uniquely equips me to gather relevant facts, identify governing standards, and render reliable opinions to aid the just resolution of banking disputes. I apply the same rigorous analysis I demanded of myself and my teams when making consequential decisions over a four-decade banking career.
 
Please contact me to discuss how my expertise and meticulous methodology can help elucidate banking issues in your case.